Bd of Trustees Glazing Health v. Shannon Chambers

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
• Decided: May 22, 2019
• Docket: 16-15588
• Status: Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE No. 16-15588 GLAZING HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE D.C. No. SOUTHERN NEVADA GLAZIERS AND 2:15-cv-01754- FABRICATORS PENSION TRUST FUND; KJD-VCF BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS UNION LOCAL 525 PENSION PLAN; THE ORDER BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTERS, GLAZIERS AND FLOORCOVERERS JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND JOURNEYMAN TRAINING TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTERS, GLAZIERS AND FLOORCOVERERS SAFETY TRAINING TRUST FUND; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PAINTERS AND FLOORCOVERERS JOINT COMMITTEE; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE SOUTHERN NEVADA PAINTERS AND DECORATORS AND GLAZIERS LABOR- MANAGEMENT COOPERATION COMMITTEE TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PAINTERS AND ALLIED TRADES INDUSTRY PENSION FUND; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE EMPLOYEE PAINTERS’ TRUST; THE 2 BD. OF TRUSTEES V. CHAMBERS

BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS JOINT PENSION TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY AND LABORERS VACATION TRUST; THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA LABORERS LOCAL 872 TRAINING TRUST; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 525 HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST AND PLAN; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS UNION LOCAL 525 PENSION PLAN; BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PLUMBERS AND PIPEFITTERS LOCAL UNION 525 APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMAN TRAINING TRUST FOR SOUTHERN NEVADA, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

SHANNON CHAMBERS, Nevada Labor Commissioner, in her official capacity, Defendant-Appellant.

Filed May 22, 2019 BD. OF TRUSTEES V. CHAMBERS 3

ORDER

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel disposition in this case shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.