BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA CTY. v. Horne

1955 OK 270, 288 P.2d 406, 1955 Okla. LEXIS 515
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 4, 1955
Docket36357
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 1955 OK 270 (BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA CTY. v. Horne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BD. OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF TULSA CTY. v. Horne, 1955 OK 270, 288 P.2d 406, 1955 Okla. LEXIS 515 (Okla. 1955).

Opinion

DAVISON, Justice.

This is a proceeding brought by the Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, employer, to review an award made by the State Industrial Commission under the Death Benefit Provision of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, 85 O.S.1951 § 1 et seq., to the widow of Eugene Richard Horne.

It was stipulated that Eugene Richard Horne was an employee of Tulsa County at the time of his death; that he received an accidental injury in the course of his employment on the 13th day of November, 1953, which resulted in his death approxi *407 mately five hours subsequent to the time of the injury.

At the time of the accidental injury resulting in his death he had been employed for approximately 20 months as a truck driver for the highway department in Tulsa County. For approximately 12 days prior to the accident he was shifted to a garage or repair shop maintained by the highway department in Tulsa County to take the place of the regular employee who was on vacation. He received the injury while working in the latter employment.

Ben Cook, the superintendent of Highway District No. 2 of Tulsa County testified that in connection with the operation of the trucks engaged in highway construction Tulsa County maintained in District No. 2 a repair shop garage or workshop out of which 40 trucks operated. This repair shop or garage was maintained for servicing and repairing all trucks and equipment incident thereto and a number of mechanics, mechanics’ helpers and service men worked therein. In the garage was an electric welder, a drill press, a grinder and buffer and a trip hammer to beat out metal. All of these instruments were operated by electricity. One and one-half hours per day was consumed by Eugene Richard Horne in placing gasoline in the trucks. The rest of the time was spent in the repair shop doing odd jobs. The accident occurred when he was placing gasoline in one of the trucks at the repair shop.

It is not disputed that the accidental injury arose out of and in the course of the employment. The dependence of claimant is not disputed.

Employment in the garage or repair shop of the Highway Department of Tulsa County under the facts herein was employment in a workshop under the provisions of 85 O.S.1951 §§ 2 and 3. Gooldy v. Lawson, 155 Okl. 259, 9 P.2d 22; Lee Way Stage Lines v. Simmons, 166 Okl. 203, 26 P.2d 905.

There was no error in the award of the State Industrial Commission finding that Eugene Richard Horne sustained an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of his employment and that at the time of said accidental injury he was employed in hazardous employment within the meaning and definition of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Award sustained.

JOHNSON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and CORN, HALLEY, BLACKBIRD and JACKSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Oklahoma City v. Watkins
1973 OK 78 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1973)
Apache Motor Company v. Elliott
1965 OK 110 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1965)
Skelly Oil Company v. Waters
1959 OK 235 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1959)
City of Tulsa v. State Industrial Commission
1957 OK 219 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1955 OK 270, 288 P.2d 406, 1955 Okla. LEXIS 515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bd-of-county-commissioners-of-tulsa-cty-v-horne-okla-1955.