B.C. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

B.C. v. State

681 So. 2d 934, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11387, 1996 WL 626119

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedOctober 30, 1996

DocketNo. 95-2506

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 681 So. 2d 934 (B.C. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B.C. v. State, 681 So. 2d 934, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11387, 1996 WL 626119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

B.C., a minor child, was adjudicated guilty of burglary of an occupied structure and petit theft. The judge imposed sentence without consideration of a predisposition report, as required by section 39.052(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). The record contains no evidence that appellant waived consideration of the predisposition report. This appeal followed.

We affirm appellant’s adjudication of guilt, but vacate his sentence pursuant to this court’s decision in B.B. v. State, 647 So.2d 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We remand for a new disposition hearing with instructions that appellant either waive his right to consideration of a predisposition report on the record or, alternatively, that the trial court order and consider a predisposition report prior to final disposition of the matter.

WARNER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

B.C., a minor child, was adjudicated guilty of burglary of an occupied structure and petit theft. The judge imposed sentence without consideration of a predisposition report, as required by section 39.052(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). The record contains no evidence that appellant waived consideration of the predisposition report. This appeal followed.

We affirm appellant’s adjudication of guilt, but vacate his sentence pursuant to this court’s decision in B.B. v. State, 647 So.2d 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We remand for a new disposition hearing with instructions that appellant either waive his right to consideration of a predisposition report on the record or, alternatively, that the trial court order and consider a predisposition report prior to final disposition of the matter.

WARNER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

681 So. 2d 934, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11387, 1996 WL 626119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bc-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack