B.C. v. State

681 So. 2d 934, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11387, 1996 WL 626119
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 1996·No. No. 95-2506·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

B.C., a minor child, was adjudicated guilty of burglary of an occupied structure and petit theft. The judge imposed sentence without consideration of a predisposition report, as required by section 39.052(4)(a), Florida Statutes (1995). The record contains no evidence that appellant waived consideration of the predisposition report. This appeal followed.

We affirm appellant’s adjudication of guilt, but vacate his sentence pursuant to this court’s decision in B.B. v. State, 647 So.2d 268 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). We remand for a new disposition hearing with instructions that appellant either waive his right to consideration of a predisposition report on the record or, alternatively, that the trial court order and consider a predisposition report prior to final disposition of the matter.

WARNER, PARIENTE and STEVENSON, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B.C. v. State, 681 So. 2d 934, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11387, 1996 WL 626119 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

681 So. 2d 934 (B.C. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A.H. v. State
708 So. 2d 1043 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)