BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co. KG v. Fluence Energy LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedJanuary 18, 2022
Docket3:21-cv-02014
StatusUnknown

This text of BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co. KG v. Fluence Energy LLC (BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co. KG v. Fluence Energy LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co. KG v. Fluence Energy LLC, (S.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BBC CHARTERING CARRIERS Case No.: 21-cv-02014-BEN-JLB GMBH & CO. KG, 12 SCHEDULING ORDER Plaintiff, 13 REGULATING DISCOVERY v. AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL 14 PROCEEDINGS FLUENCE ENERGY, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 Pursuant to Rule 16.1(d) of the Local Rules, a Case Management Conference was 18 held on January 14, 2022. After consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties 19 and being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 20 ORDERED: 21 1. No later than February 11, 2022, the parties shall file a detailed discovery 22 timeline which includes the parties’ specific plan and timeline for completing discovery. 23 Every sixty (60) days thereafter, the parties shall file a Joint Status Report indicating their 24 progress and compliance with the discovery timeline. 25 2. The Court understands that parties to litigation often enter into stipulations 26 that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information 27 not be revealed or be revealed only in specified way. Any motion for a protective order 28 1 entering such stipulation(s) in this case shall be filed as a joint motion no later than 2 February 15, 2022, and comply with § VI of Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt’s Civil 3 Chambers Rules. The parties may use Judge Burkhardt’s model protective order, which is 4 available on the Court’s website under her Chambers Rules.1 5 If the need for a protective order is not initially apparent to the parties and only 6 becomes apparent due to a later development in the case, the parties must seek leave to file 7 a late motion for protective order. Any such motion shall be supported by good cause, 8 which includes an explanation as to why the parties could not have anticipated the need for 9 a protective order. 10 3. Any motion to join other parties, to amend the pleadings, or to file additional 11 pleadings shall be filed by February 28, 2022. 12 4. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by August 5, 2022. 13 “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 14 Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of 15 time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking 16 into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of 17 Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with 18 regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Civil Local Rule 26.1(a). The Court 19 expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court intervention 20 through the meet and confer process. If the parties reach an impasse on any discovery 21 issue, counsel shall file an appropriate motion within the time limit and procedures outlined 22 in the undersigned magistrate judge’s chambers rules. A failure to comply in this regard 23 will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent an order of the court, no 24 stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be recognized by the court. 25 Discovery disputes must be brought to the Court’s attention in the time and manner 26

27 1 https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/burkhardt/docs/Burkhardt%20Model 28 1 required by § V of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. All discovery disputes must 2 be raised within 30 calendar days of the service of an objection, answer, or response 3 that becomes the subject of dispute, or the passage of a discovery due date without response 4 or production, and only after counsel (and any unrepresented parties) have met and 5 conferred to resolve the dispute. See J. Burkhardt Civ. Chambers R. § V. 6 5. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by June 3, 2022. 7 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(A), the parties must identify any 8 person who may be used at trial to present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of 9 the Federal Rules of Evidence. This requirement is not limited to retained experts. The 10 date for exchange of rebuttal experts shall be by July 6, 2022. The written designations 11 shall include the name, address and telephone number of the expert and a reasonable 12 summary of the testimony the expert is expected to provide. The list shall also include the 13 normal rates the expert charges for deposition and trial testimony. 14 6. By June 3, 2022, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions in 15 Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure 16 requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert 17 testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of 18 expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to 19 make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use 20 evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In addition, 21 the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 22 37(c). 23 7. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 24 evidence under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2)(D) and 26(e) by July 6, 2022. 25 8. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by August 5, 2022. The 26 parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing fact 27 discovery. 28 /// 1 9. Failure to comply with the above paragraphs or any other discovery order of 2 the court may result in the sanctions provided for in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37, 3 including a prohibition on the introduction of experts or other designated matters in 4 evidence. 5 10. All other pretrial motions must be filed by September 2, 2022. Counsel for 6 the moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who 7 will hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and 8 the hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. 9 Failure to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 10 Deadlines for filing motions in limine will be set by the district judge at the final Pretrial 11 Conference. 12 11. When filing a Motion for Summary Judgment and/or Adjudication, the parties 13 need not file a separate statement of material facts absent prior leave of court. 14 12. A Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) shall be conducted on 15 August 17, 2022 at 1:45 PM in the chambers of Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt, 16 Edward J. Schwartz U.S. Courthouse, 221 West Broadway, Suite 5140, San Diego, 17 California 92101. No later than August 8, 2022, counsel (and any unrepresented parties) 18 shall lodge confidential MSC statements with Judge Burkhardt’s chambers via e-mail at 19 efile_Burkhardt@casd.uscourts.gov. The parties’ MSC statements shall comply with § 20 III.C. of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers Rules. 21 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.3, all party representatives and claims adjusters for 22 insured defendants with full and unlimited authority2 to negotiate and enter into a binding 23

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 481 (D. Arizona, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
BBC Chartering Carriers GmbH & Co. KG v. Fluence Energy LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bbc-chartering-carriers-gmbh-co-kg-v-fluence-energy-llc-casd-2022.