Bazsa v. Bazsa

762 So. 2d 585, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8984, 2000 WL 985730
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 19, 2000
DocketNo. 3D99-941
StatusPublished

This text of 762 So. 2d 585 (Bazsa v. Bazsa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bazsa v. Bazsa, 762 So. 2d 585, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8984, 2000 WL 985730 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Rohlfs v. Rohlfs, 666 So.2d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Yurgel v. Yurgel, 572 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1990); Greenfield v. Greenfield, 599 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review denied, 613 So.2d 4 (Fla.1992); see Bazsa v. Bazsa, 751 So.2d 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(table).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rohlfs v. Rohlfs
666 So. 2d 568 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Yurgel v. Yurgel
572 So. 2d 1327 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Greenfield v. Greenfield
599 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 So. 2d 585, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8984, 2000 WL 985730, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bazsa-v-bazsa-fladistctapp-2000.