Bazsa v. Bazsa

762 So. 2d 585, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8984, 2000 WL 985730
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 19, 2000·No. No. 3D99-941·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Rohlfs v. Rohlfs, 666 So.2d 568 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Yurgel v. Yurgel, 572 So.2d 1327 (Fla.1990); Greenfield v. Greenfield, 599 So.2d 1029 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), review denied, 613 So.2d 4 (Fla.1992); see Bazsa v. Bazsa, 751 So.2d 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000)(table).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bazsa v. Bazsa, 762 So. 2d 585, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8984, 2000 WL 985730 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

762 So. 2d 585 (Bazsa v. Bazsa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rohlfs v. Rohlfs
666 So. 2d 568 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Yurgel v. Yurgel
572 So. 2d 1327 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)
Greenfield v. Greenfield
599 So. 2d 1029 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)