Bazinsky v. Kesbec, Inc.
36 N.E.2d 694, 286 N.Y. 655, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2200
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the ground that the use of defendant’s premises for commercial parking of more *656 than five motor vehicles is lawful (see Matter of Boardwalk and Seashore Corp. v. Murdock, 286 N. Y. 494, decided herewith), and that, therefore, there is no basis for grantinginjunctive relief. No opinion. (See 286 N. Y. 723.)
• Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Lottghran, Finch, Rippey, Lewis, Conway and Desmond, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bazinsky v. Kesbec, Inc., 36 N.E.2d 694, 286 N.Y. 655, 1941 N.Y. LEXIS 2200 (N.Y. 1941).
36 N.E.2d 694 (Bazinsky v. Kesbec, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cord Meyer Development Co. v. Bell Bay Drugs, Inc.
229 N.E.2d 44 (New York Court of Appeals, 1967)
Town of North Hempstead v. Bialek
51 Misc. 2d 75 (New York Supreme Court, 1966)
Cord Meyer Development Co. v. Bell Bay Drugs, Inc.
25 A.D.2d 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)
Westchester Motels, Inc. v. Village of Elmsford
20 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1964)
Kreatchman v. Ramsburg
167 A.2d 345 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1961)
People v. Miller
106 N.E.2d 34 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Bazinsky v. Kesbec, Inc.
37 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1941)