Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Assocs., P C.

D.C. Circuit

Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Assocs., P C.

282 F. Supp. 3d 203

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 2017

DocketCivil Action No. 13–1995 (ABJ)

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 282 F. Supp. 3d 203 (Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Assocs., P C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baylor v. Mitchell Rubenstein & Assocs., P C., 282 F. Supp. 3d 203 (D.C. Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

CONCLUSION

After an independent review of the record, including the attorney's fee motions filed in this case, the time entries and declarations submitted by both parties, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the parties' objections to the Magistrate Judge's ruling, and based on the Court's ultimate authority and discretion to award attorney's fees, defendant must pay attorney's fees in the amount of $17,000.00 plus postjudgment interest to plaintiff.

A separate order will issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONCLUSION

After an independent review of the record, including the attorney's fee motions filed in this case, the time entries and declarations submitted by both parties, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the parties' objections to the Magistrate Judge's ruling, and based on the Court's ultimate authority and discretion to award attorney's fees, defendant must pay attorney's fees in the amount of $17,000.00 plus postjudgment interest to plaintiff.

A separate order will issue.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

282 F. Supp. 3d 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baylor-v-mitchell-rubenstein-assocs-p-c-cadc-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack