Baylor University Medical Center v. Heckler

730 F.2d 391, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 23, 1984
DocketNo. 83-1442
StatusPublished
Cited by25 cases

This text of 730 F.2d 391 (Baylor University Medical Center v. Heckler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Baylor University Medical Center v. Heckler, 730 F.2d 391, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252 (5th Cir. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Under Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (“Medicare Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 1395, et seq., hospitals providing health care services to Medicare patients are to be paid by the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) their [392]*392reasonable costs in rendering routine services to Medicare patients. During administrative proceedings in this case and the resulting action in district court, Baylor University Medical Center and Harris Hospital-Methodist (“hospitals”) contended that they were not paid the full amount of reimbursement to which they were entitled for routine services rendered to Medicare patients during certain accounting periods. The hospitals argued that the insufficient reimbursements resulted from the Secretary’s inclusion of labor and delivery room patients in the inpatient census, even though those patients had not yet received routine care. See § 2345, Secretary’s Provider Reimbursement Manual. Because the inpatient census is the very basis of the average per diem cost figures used to calculate total reimbursements, the hospitals allege that the Secretary’s practice distorts average costs to the detriment of non-Medicare patients.

The district court agreed with the hospitals’ position and held that labor and delivery room patients are not includable in the midnight census used to compute the average cost of routine services for purposes of Medicare reimbursement. Baylor University Medical Center v. Schweiker, 563 F.Supp. 1081 (N.D.Tex.1983). We affirm on the basis of the reasons adequately set forth in the district court’s opinion and by the Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and Ninth Circuit in St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center v. Schweiker, 718 F.2d 459 (D.C.Cir.1983) and International Philanthropic Hospital Foundation v. Heckler, 724 F.2d 1368 (9th Cir.1984). Our affirmance, however, is of this case only and should not be construed to invalidate the practice of including labor and delivery room patients in the inpatient census in all situations. Hospital practices vary, and the Secretary is free to produce evidence showing that the artificially low reimbursement alleged to result from including labor and delivery room patients in the census is offset by other accounting factors, including those recognized in St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center and International Philanthropic Hospital Foundation.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

University of Michigan Hospital v. Bowen
812 F.2d 1005 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
Borgess Medical Center v. Otis R. Bowen
812 F.2d 1005 (Sixth Circuit, 1987)
Sioux Valley Hospital v. Bowen
792 F.2d 715 (Eighth Circuit, 1986)
Community Hospital v. Health & Human Services
770 F.2d 1257 (Fourth Circuit, 1985)
McKeesport Hospital v. Heckler
612 F. Supp. 279 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1985)
Central DuPage Hospital v. Heckler
761 F.2d 354 (Seventh Circuit, 1985)
Culpeper Memorial Hospital v. Heckler
592 F. Supp. 1173 (E.D. Virginia, 1984)
St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 937 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Aurora Community Hospital v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 933 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Pomona Valley Community Hospital Ltd. v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 935 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Providence Hospital v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 940 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Research Medical Center v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 942 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Dallas/Fort Worth Hospital Council v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 944 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Washington Hospital Center Corp. v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 948 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Citizens General Hospital v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 951 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Woods Memorial Hospital District v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 953 (District of Columbia, 1984)
Providence-St. Margaret Health Center v. Heckler
587 F. Supp. 955 (District of Columbia, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
730 F.2d 391, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baylor-university-medical-center-v-heckler-ca5-1984.