Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Baum v. Crosfield

Baum v. Crosfield

280 A.D. 805, 113 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3771
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baum v. Crosfield. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D. 1088 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 16, 1952·Published

Opinion

Motion f or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied. Present — Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MaeCrate and Schmidt, JJ. [See 279 App. Div. 1088; post, p. 985],

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baum v. Crosfield, 280 A.D. 805, 113 N.Y.S.2d 773, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3771 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

280 A.D. 805 (Baum v. Crosfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.