Baum v. Crosfield
279 A.D. 798, 110 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baum v. Crosfield. Read the opinion of the Court — 279 A.D. 1088 →
Opinion
Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Wenzel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baum v. Crosfield, 279 A.D. 798, 110 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).
279 A.D. 798 (Baum v. Crosfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.