Bauer & Deitch, P.C. v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Bauer & Deitch, P.C. v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company

DecidedJanuary 8, 2019

DocketA19D0225

StatusPublished

This text of Bauer & Deitch, P.C. v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company (Bauer & Deitch, P.C. v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bauer & Deitch, P.C. v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 07, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0225. BAUER & DEITCH, P.C. et al. v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

In 2017, Bauer & Deitch, P. C. and Fryer, Shuster & Lester, P. C. filed a continuing garnishment action against GEICO. GEICO failed to timely answer, and the plaintiffs obtained a default judgment in June 2018. Several months later, respondents – multiple entities having “GEICO” in their corporate names – filed a motion to set aside the default judgment. On November 9, 2018, the trial court granted the motion and set aside the default judgment. The plaintiffs then filed this application for discretionary appeal. Although appeals from “cases involving garnishment” must generally come by discretionary application, see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (4), the grant of a motion to set aside is interlocutory. See Guy v. Roberson, 214 Ga. App. 391, 392 (1) (448 SE2d 60) (1994); English v. Tucker Fed. S & L Assn., 175 Ga. App. 69, 69 (332 SE2d 365) (1985). Such non-final orders must be appealed through the interlocutory appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Guy, 214 Ga. App. at 392 (1); English, 175 Ga. App. at 70. And where both discretionary and interlocutory application procedures apply, the applicant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedure and obtain a timely certificate of immediate review before filing an application. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Because the plaintiffs failed to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/07/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract f rom the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ January 07, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19D0225. BAUER & DEITCH, P.C. et al. v. GEICO ADVANTAGE INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

In 2017, Bauer & Deitch, P. C. and Fryer, Shuster & Lester, P. C. filed a continuing garnishment action against GEICO. GEICO failed to timely answer, and the plaintiffs obtained a default judgment in June 2018. Several months later, respondents – multiple entities having “GEICO” in their corporate names – filed a motion to set aside the default judgment. On November 9, 2018, the trial court granted the motion and set aside the default judgment. The plaintiffs then filed this application for discretionary appeal. Although appeals from “cases involving garnishment” must generally come by discretionary application, see OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (4), the grant of a motion to set aside is interlocutory. See Guy v. Roberson, 214 Ga. App. 391, 392 (1) (448 SE2d 60) (1994); English v. Tucker Fed. S & L Assn., 175 Ga. App. 69, 69 (332 SE2d 365) (1985). Such non-final orders must be appealed through the interlocutory appeal procedure set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). Guy, 214 Ga. App. at 392 (1); English, 175 Ga. App. at 70. And where both discretionary and interlocutory application procedures apply, the applicant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedure and obtain a timely certificate of immediate review before filing an application. See Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 832 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Because the plaintiffs failed to follow the interlocutory appeal procedure, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 01/07/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract f rom the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Bauer & Deitch, P.C. v. Geico Advantage Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bauer-deitch-pc-v-geico-advantage-insurance-company-gactapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack