Baucus v. . Barr
13 N.E. 939, 107 N.Y. 624, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 1048
Opinion
Agree to affirm on opinions of General and Special Terms.
All concur except Earl, J., dissenting; Ruger, Cít. J., not sitting, and Andrews, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Baucus v. . Barr, 13 N.E. 939, 107 N.Y. 624, 1887 N.Y. LEXIS 1048 (N.Y. 1887).
13 N.E. 939 (Baucus v. . Barr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Accounting of Salzman
6 Misc. 2d 704 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
Flanagan v. Connolly
235 P. 408 (Montana Supreme Court, 1925)
In Re Connolly's Estate
235 P. 408 (Montana Supreme Court, 1925)
People ex rel. Foster v. Chicago Bonding & Surety Co.
216 Ill. App. 375 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1920)
Thayer v. Erie County Savings Bank
160 A.D. 300 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
People v. Rardin
171 Ill. App. 226 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1912)
In re the Judicial Settlement of the Final Account of Strong
111 A.D. 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)
Keegan v. Smith
60 A.D. 168 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Walker v. Walker
57 P. 991 (California Supreme Court, 1899)
Keegan v. Smith
39 N.Y.S. 826 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1896)
Ross v. Kansas City
48 Mo. App. 440 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1892)