Battle v. State

50 S.E. 342, 122 Ga. 575, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 269
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 24, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ITish, P. J.

An indictment framed-under the provisions of the Penal Code, § 234, making it a felony to utter a forged “ order for money or goods, or other thing of value,” charged the accused with uttering a forged order, the tenor of which was as follows : “ Please let Minnie have that dress but not the wase for i dontowe but $3d and i will see to your getting the money. . . . it will be all-rightHeld, that the order itself sufficiently indicated that the dress was of value, as against a motion in arrest of judgment on the ground that the indictment failed to allege the value of the dress, or that it was an article of value. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battle v. State, 50 S.E. 342, 122 Ga. 575, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 269 (Ga. 1905).

50 S.E. 342 (Battle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State
133 S.E. 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)