Battle v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Battle v. Commissioner

1 B.T.A. 1167, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2624

CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals

DecidedMay 21, 1925

DocketDocket No. 1853.

StatusPublished

This text of 1 B.T.A. 1167 (Battle v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Battle v. Commissioner, 1 B.T.A. 1167, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2624 (bta 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION.

Green:

The taxpayer has offered no evidence in support of her contentions. We find nothing in the evidence to support the Commissioner’s contention that the attorneys’ fees allowed and paid were for services rendered the taxpayer herein as an individual. The Commissioner also contends that the attorneys’ fees so allowed and paid were excessive, but he has offered no proof to substantiate this contention.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION.

Green:

The taxpayer has offered no evidence in support of her contentions. We find nothing in the evidence to support the Commissioner’s contention that the attorneys’ fees allowed and paid were for services rendered the taxpayer herein as an individual. The Commissioner also contends that the attorneys’ fees so allowed and paid were excessive, but he has offered no proof to substantiate this contention.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 B.T.A. 1167, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battle-v-commissioner-bta-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack