Appeal of Battle

1 B.T.A. 1167, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2624
CourtUnited States Board of Tax Appeals
DecidedMay 21, 1925
DocketDocket No. 1853
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 B.T.A. 1167 (Appeal of Battle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Board of Tax Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Appeal of Battle, 1 B.T.A. 1167, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2624 (bta 1925).

Opinion

OPINION.

Green:

The taxpayer has offered no evidence in support of her contentions. We find nothing in the evidence to support the Commissioner’s contention that the attorneys’ fees allowed and paid were for services rendered the taxpayer herein as an individual. The Commissioner also contends that the attorneys’ fees so allowed and paid were excessive, but he has offered no proof to substantiate this contention.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Battle v. Commissioner
1 B.T.A. 1167 (Board of Tax Appeals, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 B.T.A. 1167, 1925 BTA LEXIS 2624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/appeal-of-battle-bta-1925.