Battle v. Bogent

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2004·No. 04-7052·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7052

AARON BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAUL BOGENT, Doctor; DOCTOR HASKETTES; NURSE HARRIS; NURSE HOUSE,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-277-3)

Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Samuel Samet, GOODMAN, ALLEN & FILETTI, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Aaron Battle appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Battle v.

Bogent, No. CA-03-277-3 (E.D. Va. May 20, 2004). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Battle v. Bogent, (4th Cir. 2004).

Battle v. Bogent (Battle v. Bogent) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related