Battle v. Bogent
This text of Battle v. Bogent (Battle v. Bogent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 04-7052
AARON BATTLE, Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
PAUL BOGENT, Doctor; DOCTOR HASKETTES; NURSE HARRIS; NURSE HOUSE,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (CA-03-277-3)
Submitted: October 14, 2004 Decided: October 21, 2004
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Aaron Battle, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Samuel Samet, GOODMAN, ALLEN & FILETTI, Glen Allen, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Aaron Battle appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Battle v.
Bogent, No. CA-03-277-3 (E.D. Va. May 20, 2004). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Battle v. Bogent, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/battle-v-bogent-ca4-2004.