Batten v. Ford
3 N.J.L. 455
Opinion
It was objected, first, that this state of demand was too uncertain, hut the Court thought that this was a sufficient statement of a contract of sale; it was then contended, that this was a contract for the sale of land, and therefore ought to be in writing, according to the statute; but th© Court over-ruled the objection, and Affirmed the judgment
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Batten v. Ford, 3 N.J.L. 455 (N.J. 1808).
3 N.J.L. 455 (Batten v. Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Hunter
68 A.2d 274 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)