Batson v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BRUNSWICK
This text of 318 S.E.2d 227 (Batson v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BRUNSWICK) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Forest Batson, Jr., and Alma Batson bring this appeal from the denial of their motion for a new trial and motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.
1. OCGA § 5-5-40 (Code Ann. § 70-301) provides: “All motions for new trial, except in extraordinary cases, shall be made within 30 days of the entry of the judgment on the verdict or entry of the judgment where the case was tried without a jury.”
Trial was held on April 4, 1983, and the court directed a verdict in favor of appellee. The judgment was entered on April 6, 1983, and the motion was filed on May 9, 1983.
This motion was not timely filed, and appellants did not comply with the requirements of OCGA § 5-5-41 (Code Ann. § 70-303) for the filing of an extraordinary motion for a new trial. The enumeration dealing with the general grounds will therefore not be addressed by this court.
2. Under OCGA § 9-11-50 (Code Ann. § 81A-150) a motion for a directed verdict is a prerequisite to the filing of a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. As appellants did not make a motion for a directed verdict at trial, their second enumeration is without merit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
318 S.E.2d 227, 170 Ga. App. 803, 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 2045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batson-v-first-national-bank-of-brunswick-gactapp-1984.