Batista v. Manhattanville College

New York Court of Appeals

Batista v. Manhattanville College

68 N.E.3d 83, 28 N.Y.3d 1093

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2016

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 68 N.E.3d 83 (Batista v. Manhattanville College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Batista v. Manhattanville College, 68 N.E.3d 83, 28 N.Y.3d 1093 (N.Y. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, modified, without costs, by granting plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim against defendants Manhattanville College and TJR, Inc. and, as so modified, affirmed, and certified question answered in the negative. Defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his accident (see Barreto v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 25 NY3d 426, 433-434 [2015]).

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order, insofar as appealed from, modified, without costs, by granting plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability on his Labor Law § 240 (1) claim against defendants Manhattanville College and TJR, Inc. and, as so modified, affirmed, and certified question answered in the negative. Defendants failed to raise a triable issue of fact whether the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his accident (see Barreto v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 25 NY3d 426, 433-434 [2015]).

Concur: Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera, Abdus-Salaam, Stein, Fahey and Garcia.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

68 N.E.3d 83, 28 N.Y.3d 1093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/batista-v-manhattanville-college-ny-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack