Bateman v. Hawker Energy, Inc

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 RYAN BATEMAN, Case No. 2:20-cv-02049-APG-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order 10] v. [Docket No. 50] 11! HAWKER ENERGY, INC., et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of 14] their motion to dismiss. Docket No. 50; see also Docket No. 28 (motion to dismiss).' Plaintiff filed a response in opposition. Docket No. 53; see also Docket No. 38 (response to motion to 16] dismiss). The deadline for filing a reply has expired. See Local Rule 7-2(b). Considering the 17} governing standards, Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the 18} Court finds that a stay of discovery is appropriate in this case. 19 Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. In the event resolution of the 20] motion to dismiss does not result in the ending of this case, a joint proposed discovery plan must 21} be filed within 14 days of the issuance of that order. 23 Dated: September 8, 2021 24 ZR (ony Nancy ns 25 United States‘Magistrate Judge 26) ———___ ' The Court previously granted a motion to stay discovery in this case. Docket No. 20. 27 Defendants’ initial motion to dismiss was later granted with Plaintiff being afforded an opportunity to amend. Docket No. 22. The instant motion to stay discovery is predicated on Defendants’ 28] motion to dismiss the amended complaint. Docket No. 28.