Bateman v. Hawker Energy, Inc
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8] RYAN BATEMAN, Case No.: 2:20-cv-02049-APG-NJK 9 Plaintiff(s), Order v. [Docket No. 15] 11] HAWKER ENERGY, INC.), et al., 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay discovery pending resolution of 14 their motion to dismiss. Docket No. 15; see also Docket No. 11 (motion to dismiss). Plaintiff did 15} not respond to either the motion to stay discovery or the motion to dismiss. Considering the 16] governing standards, Kor Media Group, LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013), the 17} Court finds that a stay of discovery is appropriate in this case. 18 Accordingly, the motion to stay discovery is GRANTED. In the event resolution of the motion to dismiss does not result in the ending of this case, a joint proposed discovery plan must 20] be filed within 14 days of the issuance of that order. 22 Dated: April 20, 2021 23 fe Nancy J. Koppe\ 24 United States Magistrate Judge 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bateman v. Hawker Energy, Inc (Bateman v. Hawker Energy, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.