Bass v. State

651 So. 2d 815, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2388, 1995 WL 96892
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 1995·No. No. 94-03770·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles W. Bass appeals the denial of his motion to correct sentence in which he claimed that the state failed to notify him prior to plea negotiations that he was subject to treatment as a habitual offender. The trial court denied the motion on its merits. Although we affirm per curiam the denial of Bass’ motion, we note that the motion was unsworn, and thus procedurally defective, and more significantly, that issue raised therein was not proper for review under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), review denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1992).

Affirmed.

FRANK, C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bass v. State, 651 So. 2d 815, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2388, 1995 WL 96892 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

651 So. 2d 815 (Bass v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robinson v. State
692 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)