Bass v. State

662 So. 2d 1024, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2541
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 17, 1995·No. 95-204·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

662 So.2d 1024 (1995)

Steven E. BASS, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-204.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

November 17, 1995.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Susan A. Fagan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael D. Crotty, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

COBB, Judge.

An order revoking probation must state the probationary condition(s) which the trial court found was violated. Blair v. State, 636 So.2d 784 *1025 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Titus v. State, 635 So.2d 1027 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994); Murphy v. State, 612 So.2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Haynes v. State, 571 So.2d 1380 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). The order entered here does not and, therefore, must be reversed. The cause is remanded for entry of a written order specifying the condition of probation which the defendant violated.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

DAUKSCH and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bass v. State, 662 So. 2d 1024, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2541 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

662 So. 2d 1024 (Bass v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weinstein v. State
708 So. 2d 690 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Barta v. State
678 So. 2d 923 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Forget v. State
675 So. 2d 259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)