Bass v. State

651 So. 2d 815, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2388, 1995 WL 96892
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 10, 1995
DocketNo. 94-03770
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 651 So. 2d 815 (Bass v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bass v. State, 651 So. 2d 815, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2388, 1995 WL 96892 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Charles W. Bass appeals the denial of his motion to correct sentence in which he claimed that the state failed to notify him prior to plea negotiations that he was subject to treatment as a habitual offender. The trial court denied the motion on its merits. Although we affirm per curiam the denial of Bass’ motion, we note that the motion was unsworn, and thus procedurally defective, and more significantly, that issue raised therein was not proper for review under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). See Judge v. State, 596 So.2d 73, 77 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991), review denied, 613 So.2d 5 (Fla. 1992).

Affirmed.

FRANK, C.J., and BLUE and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. State
692 So. 2d 275 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
651 So. 2d 815, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 2388, 1995 WL 96892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bass-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.