Basker v. State

446 P.2d 780, 202 Kan. 177, 1968 Kan. LEXIS 248
CourtSupreme Court of Kansas
DecidedNovember 9, 1968
Docket45,390
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 446 P.2d 780 (Basker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Basker v. State, 446 P.2d 780, 202 Kan. 177, 1968 Kan. LEXIS 248 (kan 1968).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

Frank Basker was convicted by a jury of attempted robbery in the first degree. His conviction was upheld by this court in State v. Basker, 198 Kan. 242, 424 P. 2d 535. The present appeal is from post conviction proceedings pursuant to K. S. A. 60-1507. Frank Basker was present at the proceedings. He was represented by counsel. His motion to set aside sentence was denied by the trial court upon proper findings.

The first three points now raised were considered and rejected in the direct appeal. These points presented no substantial question of law or issue of fact to the trial court. They will not be reconsidered by this court. (Carter v. State, 199 Kan. 290, 428 P. 2d 758.)

Appellant claims he was deprived of a speedy trial although it does not appear who caused the delay. He was bound over for trial on June 20, 1964 (during the June term). His trial commenced February 2,1965 (during the December term). Only the September term of court intervened. The requirements of K. S. A. 62-1431 were met and appellant was not deprived of a speedy trial. (State v. Williams, 187 Kan. 629, 360 P. 2d 11.)

The final point specified pursuant to Rule No. 6 (cl) of the Su *178 preme Court (197 Kan. lxi) was neither briefed nor argued. It is deemed abandoned. (Tate v. State, 196 Kan. 435, 411 P. 2d 661.)

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mims
564 P.2d 531 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1977)
State v. Johnson
549 P.2d 1370 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1976)
State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. Unified School District 259
542 P.2d 664 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1975)
Virgil Jenkins v. Robert Atkins, Acting Warden
515 F.2d 1078 (Tenth Circuit, 1975)
Jenkins v. State
506 P.2d 1111 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1973)
Sagebiel v. State
495 P.2d 530 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1972)
Barnes v. State
476 P.2d 212 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1970)
Baker v. State
464 P.2d 212 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
446 P.2d 780, 202 Kan. 177, 1968 Kan. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/basker-v-state-kan-1968.