Bashinski Jr. v. United States

District Court, S.D. California·Decided September 8, 2023·No. 3:23-cv-01026·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 MARTIN MACK BASHINSKI JR., Case No.: 23-cv-01026-JO-JLB

14 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER 15 v. REGULATING DISCOVERY AND OTHER PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS 17 Defendant. 18 19 Pursuant to Rule 16.1(d) of the Local Rules, a Case Management Conference was 20 held on September 7, 2023. After consulting with the attorneys of record for the parties 21 and being advised of the status of the case, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY 22 ORDERED: 23 1. The Court understands that parties to litigation often enter into stipulations 24 that a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information 25 not be revealed or be revealed only in specified way. Any motion for a protective order 26 entering such stipulation(s) in this case shall be filed as a joint motion no later than 27 October 5, 2023, and comply with § VI of Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt’s Civil 28 Chambers Rules. The parties may use Judge Burkhardt’s model protective order, which is 1 available on the Court’s website under her Chambers Rules. 2 If the need for a protective order is not initially apparent to the parties and only 3 becomes apparent due to a later development in the case, the parties must seek leave to file 4 a late motion for protective order. Any such motion shall be supported by good cause, 5 which includes an explanation as to why the parties could not have anticipated the need for 6 a protective order. 7 2. Any motion to join other parties, to amend the pleadings, or to file additional 8 pleadings shall be filed by November 2, 2023. 9 3. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by May 7, 2024. 10 “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 11 Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of 12 time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking 13 into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of 14 Civil Procedure. Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with 15 regard to all discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The Court 16 expects counsel to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court intervention 17 through the meet and confer process. Discovery disputes must be brought to the Court’s 18 attention in the time and manner required by § V of Judge Burkhardt’s Civil Chambers 19 Rules. All discovery disputes must be raised within 30 calendar days of the service of 20 an objection, answer, or response that becomes the subject of dispute, or the passage of 21 a discovery due date without response or production, and only after counsel (and any 22 unrepresented parties) have met and conferred to resolve the dispute. See J. Burkhardt Civ. 23 Chambers R. § V. A failure to comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s 24 discovery issue. Absent an order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering 25 this requirement will be recognized by the court. 26

27 1 https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/burkhardt/docs/Burkhardt%20Model 28 1 4. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by 2 March 12, 2024. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to present 3 evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed. R. Evid. This requirement is not 4 limited to retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts shall be by 5 April 9, 2024. The written designations shall include the name, address and telephone 6 number of the expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to 7 provide. The list shall also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and 8 trial testimony. 9 5. By March 12, 2024, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions 10 in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure 11 requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert 12 testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of 13 expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to 14 make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use 15 evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In addition, 16 the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 17 6. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 18 evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) by April 9, 2024. 19 7. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by May 7, 2024. The 20 parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing fact 21 discovery. 22 8. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 23 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 24 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 25 9. All other pretrial motions must be filed by June 4, 2024. Counsel for the 26 moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will 27 hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and the 28 hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure 1 to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 2 Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set by the 3 district judge. 4 10. A Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) will be held by video 5 conference2 on May 22, 2024 at 9:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Jill L. Burkhardt. 6 Mandatory directions for participating in the MSC by video conference are attached 7 hereto. The purpose of the MSC is to permit an informal, candid discussion between the 8 attorneys, parties, and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to 9 achieve a mediated resolution of the case. All MSC discussions will be off the record, 10 privileged, and confidential. See CivLR 16.3(h). 11 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.3, all party representatives and claims adjusters for 12 insured defendants with full and unlimited authority3 to negotiate and enter into a binding 13 settlement, as well as the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, must be present 14 and legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the MSC. In the case 15 of an entity, an authorized representative of the entity who is not retained outside counsel 16 must be present and must have discretionary authority to commit the entity to pay an 17

18 2 If any party believes the MSC is more likely to be successful if conducted in-person, 19 that party shall meet and confer on the issue with the other parties. After meeting and conferring, and no later than 60 days before the MSC, the parties shall leave a joint 20 voicemail with chambers at (619) 557-6624 indicating which of the parties requests an in- 21 person MSC. In the voicemail, the parties shall leave three mutually available dates for a telephonic status conference to discuss whether the MSC should be held in-person. The 22 final decision will be made by the Court. 23 3 “Full authority to settle” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement 24 terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bashinski Jr. v. United States, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Bashinski Jr. v. United States (Bashinski Jr. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 481 (D. Arizona, 2003)