Barton v. the State

790 S.E.2d 538, 338 Ga. App. 524, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 485
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedAugust 15, 2016
DocketA16A0745
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 790 S.E.2d 538 (Barton v. the State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barton v. the State, 790 S.E.2d 538, 338 Ga. App. 524, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 485 (Ga. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Miller, Presiding Judge.

This is Paul Barton’s second pro se appeal arising from his 2013 conviction for two counts of sexual battery, including one count *525 against a child under the age of sixteen (OCGA § 16-6-22.1). 1 Barton was sentenced by the trial court to two consecutive five-year terms. Barton now appeals from the denial of his motion to set aside his sentence, contending that the trial court erred when it failed to sentence him to a split sentence, which would have included at least one year of probation, as required by OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b). We agree fully. Accordingly, we vacate Barton’s sentence and remand this case to the trial court for resentencing.

“A person convicted of the offense of sexual battery against any child under the age of 16 years shall be guilty of a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one nor more than five years.” OCGA § 16-6-22.1 (d).

Here, Barton entered a negotiated guilty plea to two counts of sexual battery, including one count against a child under the age of sixteen, and the trial court sentenced him to two consecutive five-yearterms. Barton’s sentence was governed by OCGA § 17-10-6.2 (b), which pertinently provides:

. . . [A]ny person convicted of a sexual offense shall be sentenced to a split sen tence which shall include the minimum term of imprisonment specified in the Code section applicable to the offense. No portion of the mandatory minimum sentence imposed shall be suspended, stayed, probated, deferred, or withheld by the sentencing court and such sentence shall include, in addition to the mandatory imprisonment, an additional probated sentence of at least one year. . . .

(Emphasis supplied.) See also Hedden v. State, 288 Ga. 871, 873-874 (708 SE2d 287) (2011).

“A sentence is void if the [trial] court imposes punishment that the law does not allow.” (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Rooney v. State, 287 Ga. 1, 2 (2) (690 SE2d 804) (2010). The trial court had jurisdiction to correct Barton’s void sentence, and Barton was entitled to directly appeal the denial of his motion to correct his sentence. 2 Id. at 2-3 (2); see also Williams v. State, 271 Ga. 686, 689 (1) (523 SE2d 857) (1999).

In this case, the underlying offenses were two counts of sexual battery, including one count against a child under the age of sixteen; *526 OCGA § 17-10-6.2 required the trial court to impose a split sentence that included a mandatory minimum sentence of at least five years of imprisonment and at least one year of supervised probation. Here, although Barton’s sentence fell within the applicable statutory range set forth in OCGA § 16-6-22.1, the trial court failed to impose a split sentence. See Spargo v. State, 332 Ga. App. 410, 411 (773 SE2d 35) (2015); New v. State, 327 Ga. App. 87, 108 (5) (755 SE2d 568) (2014). Consequently, we vacate Barton’s sentences for the two counts of sexual battery and remand this case for resentencing.

Decided August 15, 2016. Paul Barton, pro se. Leigh E. Patterson, District Attorney, Harold W. Goldin, Jr., Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.

Judgment vacated and case remanded for resentencing.

McFadden and McMillian, JJ., concur.
1

In Barton v. State, 331 Ga. App. 887 (769 SE2d 96) (2015), this Court affirmed the denial of Barton’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea.

2

Barton was convicted of two crimes charged in the same indictment. Accordingly, as the trial court correctly noted, Barton is deemed to have only one conviction for recidivist purposes.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patrick Rice v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2020
Ivan Cruz v. State
815 S.E.2d 311 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
790 S.E.2d 538, 338 Ga. App. 524, 2016 Ga. App. LEXIS 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barton-v-the-state-gactapp-2016.