Barton v. State

150 S.E. 449, 40 Ga. App. 504, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 610
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided November 12, 1929·No. 19975·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The motion for a new trial contains no special grounds. “The decision of every issue of fact is exclusively for the jury.” Davis v. Kirkland, 1 Ga. App. 5 (1) (58 S. E. 209). “No principle of law is founded upon better reason or has been more strictly adhered to by this court than that the jury are the proper judges of the weight and sufficiency of testimony and of the credibility of witnesses, and this court will not disturb the verdict of a jury where there is evidence to support its findings. Stricklin v. Crawley, 1 Ga. App. 139 (58 S. E. 215); Charles v. Brooker, 1 Ga. App. 219 (58 S. E. 218); Daughtry v. S. & S. Ry. Co., 1 Ga. App. 393 (58 S. E. 230).” Unity Cotton Mills v. Hasty, 19 Ga. App. 590 (2) (91 S. E. 916).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barton v. State, 150 S.E. 449, 40 Ga. App. 504, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 610 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

150 S.E. 449 (Barton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnston v. State
342 S.E.2d 706 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1986)
Barnes v. State
334 S.E.2d 205 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1985)