Bartley v. Bartley
249 A.D. 650, 291 N.Y.S. 548, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5395
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bartley v. Bartley. Read the opinion of the Court — 255 A.D. 992 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 30, 1936·Published
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to strike the action from the Special Term calendar and to place it on the Trial Term calendar, to be tried by a jury, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Defendants waived a trial by jury by failing to make a demand therefor pursuant to section 426 of the Civil Practice Act, within the time prescribed after they had been served with a note of issue by plaintiff. (Braunhut v. Rein, 241 App. [651]*651Div. 622.) Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bartley v. Bartley, 249 A.D. 650, 291 N.Y.S. 548, 1936 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).
249 A.D. 650 (Bartley v. Bartley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Braunhut v. Rein
241 A.D. 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)