Braunhut v. Rein
This text of 241 A.D. 622 (Braunhut v. Rein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The defendant was estopped to assert that the action was improperly on the. Special Term calendar, by reason of his conduct earlier in the litigation. Moreover, he waived a trial by jury, having failed to make a demand therefor pursuant to section 426 of the Civil Practice Act within the time prescribed after he had been served with a notice of trial by the plaintiff. He had a trial before a judge, without a jury, at Special Term, which differs in no particular, as a matter of substance, from a trial on the law side of the court before a judge without a jury. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 A.D. 622, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/braunhut-v-rein-nyappdiv-1934.