Braunhut v. Rein

241 A.D. 622
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Interlocutory judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. The defendant was estopped to assert that the action was improperly on the. Special Term calendar, by reason of his conduct earlier in the litigation. Moreover, he waived a trial by jury, having failed to make a demand therefor pursuant to section 426 of the Civil Practice Act within the time prescribed after he had been served with a notice of trial by the plaintiff. He had a trial before a judge, without a jury, at Special Term, which differs in no particular, as a matter of substance, from a trial on the law side of the court before a judge without a jury. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Braunhut v. Rein, 241 A.D. 622 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 622 (Braunhut v. Rein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bartley v. Bartley
249 A.D. 650 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Grosso v. Santori
246 A.D. 755 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)