Bartels v. Iowa

262 U.S. 404, 43 S. Ct. 628, 67 L. Ed. 1047, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2656, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 628
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 4, 1923·No. 134, 181, 182, 440·Published·Cited by 76 cases

Opinions

[409] Mr. Justice McReynolds

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The several judgments entered in these causes by the Supreme Courts of Iowa, Ohio and Nebraska, respectively, must be reversed upon authority of Meyer v. Nebraska, decided today, ante, 390.

Number 134. Plaintiff in error was convicted of teaching pupils in a parochial school below the eighth grade to read German contrary to “An act requiring the use of the English language as the medium of instruction in all secular subjects in all schools within the State of Iowa,” approved April 10, 1919.1 He used English for teaching the common school branches, but taught young pupils to read German. The Supreme Court of the State held: The manifest design of this language statute is to supplement the compulsory education law by requiring that the branches enumerated to be taught shall be taught in the English language, and in no other. The evident purpose is that no other language shall be taught in any school, public or private, during the tender years of youth, that is, below the eighth grade.” 191 Iowa, 1060.

Numbers 181 and 182. Bohning and Pohl, of St. Johns Evangelical Congregational School, Garfield Heights, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, were severally convicted (102 [410] Ohio St. 474) of violating “An act to supplement section 7762 of the General Code . . . and to repeal section 7729, concerning elementary, private and parochial schools and providing that instruction shall be in the English language,” (108 Ohio Laws 614) approved June 5, 1919,2 which prohibits the teaching of German to pupils below the eighth grade.

Number 440. An injunction is sought against the Governor and Attorney General of the State and the Attorney for Platte County to prevent enforcement of “An act to declare the English language the official language of this State, and to require all official proceedings, records and publications to be in such language and all school branches to be taught in said language in public, private, denominational and parochial schools,” etc., approved April 14, [411]*4111921.3 This statute is subject to the same objections as those offered to the Act of 1919 and sustained in Meyer v. Nebraska-, supra. The purpose of the later enactment, as stated by counsel for the State, is to place beyond the possibility for legal evasion a prohibition against the teaching in schools of foreign languages to children who have not passed the eighth grade.” The Supreme Court considered the merits of the cause, upheld the statute, and refused an injunction. 187 N. W. 927.

McKelvie and Davis, formerly Governor and Attorney General, no longer occupy those offices. The cause is dismissed as to them. Otto F. Walter is now the County Attorney and the judgment below as to him must be reversed.

Reversed.

Footnotes

Section 7762-2. All private and parochial schools and all schools maintained in connection with benevolent and correctional institutions within this state which instruct pupils who have not completed a course of study equivalent to that prescribed for the first seven grades of the elementary, schools of this state, shall be taught in the English language only, and the person or persons, trustees or officers in control shall cause to be taught in them such branches of learning as prescribed in section 7648 of the General Code or such as the advancement of pupils may require, and the persons or officers in control direct; provided that the German language shall not be taught below the eighth grade in any such schools within this state.

Section 7762-3. Any person or persons violating the provisions of this act shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and shall be fined in any sum not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than one hundred dollars, and each separate day in which such act shall be violated shall constitute a separate offense. . . .

Sec. 2. No person, individually or as a teacher, shall, in any private, denominational, or parochial or public school, teach any subject to any person in any language other than the English language.

' Sec. 3. Languages other than the English language may be taught as languages only after a pupil shall have attained and successfully passed the eighth grade as evidenced by a certificate of graduation issuéd by the county superintendent of the county or the city superintendent of the city in which the child resides. Provided, that the provisions of this act shall not apply to schools held on Sunday or on some other day of the week which those having the care and custody of the pupils attending same conscientiously observe as the Sabbath, where the object and purpose of such schools is the giving of religious instruction, but shall apply to all other schools and to schools held at all other times. Provided that nothing in this act shall prohibit any person from teaching his own children in his own home any foreign language. . . .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartels v. Iowa, 262 U.S. 404, 43 S. Ct. 628, 67 L. Ed. 1047, 1923 U.S. LEXIS 2656, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 628 (1923).

262 U.S. 404 (Bartels v. Iowa) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State of Iowa v. Mar'yo D. Lindsey Jr.
881 N.W.2d 411 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 2016)
Tribett v. Shepherd
2014 Ohio 4320 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Kramer v. New York City Board of Education
715 F. Supp. 2d 335 (E.D. New York, 2010)
Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson
2007 Ohio 6948 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2007)
Savoie v. Grange Mutual Insurance
620 N.E.2d 809 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
Savoie v. Grange Mut. Ins. Co.
1993 Ohio 134 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1993)
People v. Bennett
501 N.W.2d 106 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1993)
Sheridan Road Baptist Church v. Department of Education
396 N.W.2d 373 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1986)
Bowman v. Bethel-Tate Board of Education
610 F. Supp. 577 (S.D. Ohio, 1985)
Iowa City Community School District v. Iowa City Education Ass'n
343 N.W.2d 139 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1983)
State v. Engerud
463 A.2d 934 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1983)
Crowley v. Smithsonian Institution
636 F.2d 738 (D.C. Circuit, 1980)
Rudd v. Ray
248 N.W.2d 125 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1976)
Davis v. Page
385 F. Supp. 395 (D. New Hampshire, 1974)
Robinson v. Conlisk
385 F. Supp. 529 (N.D. Illinois, 1974)
Sugarman v. Dougall
413 U.S. 634 (Supreme Court, 1973)