Barrs v. Faye Townsend

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barrs v. Faye Townsend

852 So. 2d 929, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12530, 2003 WL 21981432

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 21, 2003

DocketNo. 1D03-2814

StatusPublished

This text of 852 So. 2d 929 (Barrs v. Faye Townsend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrs v. Faye Townsend, 852 So. 2d 929, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12530, 2003 WL 21981432 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Mary Barrs seeks review of the circuit court’s opinion reversing a decision of the county court. Barrs’s remedy is certiora-ri, rather than appeal, and therefore, we convert the appeal to a certiorari proceeding. See Haines City Community Development v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 (Fla.1995). However, because this court’s jurisdiction was not timely invoked, this proceeding is hereby dismissed. See Miller v. State, 781 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(rejecting petitioner’s argument that the time for invoking the court’s jurisdiction is measured from issuance of the circuit court’s mandate); Jones v. Cannon, 750 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

ERVIN, BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Mary Barrs seeks review of the circuit court’s opinion reversing a decision of the county court. Barrs’s remedy is certiora-ri, rather than appeal, and therefore, we convert the appeal to a certiorari proceeding. See Haines City Community Development v. Heggs, 658 So.2d 523 (Fla.1995). However, because this court’s jurisdiction was not timely invoked, this proceeding is hereby dismissed. See Miller v. State, 781 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001)(rejecting petitioner’s argument that the time for invoking the court’s jurisdiction is measured from issuance of the circuit court’s mandate); Jones v. Cannon, 750 So.2d 108 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999).

ERVIN, BARFIELD and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

852 So. 2d 929, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 12530, 2003 WL 21981432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrs-v-faye-townsend-fladistctapp-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack