Barringer v. . Foggart

94 S.E. 523, 174 N.C. 768, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 193
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 12, 1917
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 94 S.E. 523 (Barringer v. . Foggart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barringer v. . Foggart, 94 S.E. 523, 174 N.C. 768, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 193 (N.C. 1917).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

After a careful examination of tbe record, we fail to find any reversible error in tbe trial of tbe issues by either of tbe judges wbo tried them. The exception to the issues cannot be sustained. They present every contested matter presented by tbe pleadings. That Judge Carter did not render a final judgment, but permitted defendant to amend his answer and set up a counter-claim, is a matter of which the defendant cannot complain, since it cures any previous error in refusing to submit such issue. This counter-claim was fairly submitted to the jury at a subsequent term by Judge Justice and found against defendant. None of the assignments of error are directed to trial of the counter-claim.

Upon the whole record, we find

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stein v. Asheville City Board of Education
608 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 S.E. 523, 174 N.C. 768, 1917 N.C. LEXIS 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barringer-v-foggart-nc-1917.