Barrientos v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Barrientos v. State

705 So. 2d 1066, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1593, 1998 WL 66931

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 20, 1998

DocketNo. 96-01763

StatusPublished

This text of 705 So. 2d 1066 (Barrientos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barrientos v. State, 705 So. 2d 1066, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 1593, 1998 WL 66931 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges his sentence of adult sanctions for various violent felonies committed in connection with a home invasion. Because the trial court failed to enter a written order on adult sanctions in accordance with the mandate set forth in Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993), we reverse and remand for resentencing.

Appellant has previously challenged his sentence based on the trial court’s failure to make any written findings to support adult sanctions. This court remanded the ease for resentencing in compliance with section 39.059(7)(c),(d), Florida Statutes (1993), and Troutman. See Barrientos v. State, 665 So.2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995).

In this appeal Barrientos argues he is again entitled to resentencing because the trial court’s written reasons for imposing adult sanctions were reduced to writing and filed three days after sentencing rather than on the same day as required by Troutman. We agree. On remand the trial court shall enter written reasons in support of adult sanctions contemporaneously with resentenc-ing.

Reversed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI