Barrientos v. State

665 So. 2d 243, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10468, 1995 WL 583702
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 4, 1995
DocketNo. 92-04352
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 665 So. 2d 243 (Barrientos v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Barrientos v. State, 665 So. 2d 243, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10468, 1995 WL 583702 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

Rudi Barrientos appeals his convictions and sentences for numerous offenses stemming from a home invasion. We affirm his convictions but reverse and remand for re-sentencing.

Barrientos, who was a juvenile at the time he committed the offenses, was sentenced as an adult. The circuit court erred in sentencing him as an adult without making the individualized, written findings required by sections 39.059(7)(c) and (d), Florida Statutes (1991), and Troutman v. State, 630 So.2d 528 (Fla.1993).

We, therefore, affirm Barrientos’ convictions, reverse his sentences, and remand for further proceedings. The trial court may again sentence Barrientos as an adult if it complies with the requirements of sections 39.059(7)(c) and (d) and Troutman.

THREADGILL, C.J., and DANAHY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Barrientos v. State
705 So. 2d 1066 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
665 So. 2d 243, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 10468, 1995 WL 583702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barrientos-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.