Barr v. State

675 So. 2d 1046, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6914, 1996 WL 366312
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 1996·No. No. 95-2520·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no error in the trial court’s disal-lowance of the black defendant’s challenge to a Hispanic juror, Jackson v. State, 676 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), or its allowance of a prosecution challenge to a black juror who had previously been arrested and jailed. Martinez v. State, 664 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Wilkins v. State, 659 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Miller v. State, 605 So.2d 492 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 613 So.2d 7 (Fla.1993); Knight v. State, 559 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), review denied, 574 So.2d 141 (Fla.1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barr v. State, 675 So. 2d 1046, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6914, 1996 WL 366312 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

675 So. 2d 1046 (Barr v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martinez v. State
664 So. 2d 1034 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Miller v. State
605 So. 2d 492 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Wilkins v. State
659 So. 2d 1273 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Knight v. State
559 So. 2d 327 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Jackson v. State
676 So. 2d 1033 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)