Barr v. State
This text of 675 So. 2d 1046 (Barr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We find no error in the trial court’s disal-lowance of the black defendant’s challenge to a Hispanic juror, Jackson v. State, 676 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), or its allowance of a prosecution challenge to a black juror who had previously been arrested and jailed. Martinez v. State, 664 So.2d 1034 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Wilkins v. State, 659 So.2d 1273 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Miller v. State, 605 So.2d 492 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), review denied, 613 So.2d 7 (Fla.1993); Knight v. State, 559 So.2d 327 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), review denied, 574 So.2d 141 (Fla.1990).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
675 So. 2d 1046, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6914, 1996 WL 366312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.