Barr & Creelman Co. v. State

265 A.D. 893, 37 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6367
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 11, 1942·No. Claim No. 23371·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

[894] There is an assertion on the part of the State that the general contractor violated section 138, article 9, of the State Finance Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 56) in subletting the work without the consent of the State. It appears however that the agent of the State had knowledge that the sub-contractor was doing the work, and the work was accepted thereafter. The evidence fully justifies the award and judgment as to the various items of damage allowed. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barr & Creelman Co. v. State, 265 A.D. 893, 37 N.Y.S.2d 770, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6367 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

265 A.D. 893 (Barr & Creelman Co. v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CTS CONTRACTING, INC. v. TOWN OF CHEEKTOWAGA
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017
National Guardian Security Services Corp. v. City of New York
218 A.D.2d 549 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
A. & J. Buyers, Inc. v. People
54 Misc. 2d 995 (New York Supreme Court, 1967)