Barr & Creelman Co. v. State
This text of 265 A.D. 893 (Barr & Creelman Co. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[894]*894There is an assertion on the part of the State that the general contractor violated section 138, article 9, of the State Finance Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 56) in subletting the work without the consent of the State. It appears however that the agent of the State had knowledge that the sub-contractor was doing the work, and the work was accepted thereafter. The evidence fully justifies the award and judgment as to the various items of damage allowed. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Foster, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
265 A.D. 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barr-creelman-co-v-state-nyappdiv-1942.