Barney O. Padgett v. Anthony J. Principi

18 Vet. App. 223, 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 529, 2004 WL 1878802
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided August 17, 2004·No. 02-2259·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

On July 9, 2004, in a panel opinion, the Court vacated the August 8, 2002, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) decision and remanded the matter for readjudication. See Padgett v. Principi, 18 Vet.App. 188 (2004). During the internal circulation of that opinion before its release, see the Court’s Internal Operating Procedures at TV.(a)(2), a judge requested full-Court consideration.

On consideration of the foregoing, and it appearing that there is no majority in favor of the request for full-Court consideration, it is

ORDERED that full-Court consideration is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barney O. Padgett v. Anthony J. Principi, 18 Vet. App. 223, 2004 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 529, 2004 WL 1878802 (Cal. 2004).

18 Vet. App. 223 (Barney O. Padgett v. Anthony J. Principi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barney O. Padgett v. R. James Nicholson
19 Vet. App. 133 (Veterans Claims, 2005)