Barnett v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-7130

BERNARD BARNETT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:06-cv-00336-JLK)

Submitted: November 15, 2006 Decided: November 21, 2006

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Jack Bondurant, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Bernard Barnett appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)

in relation to the court’s denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Barnett v. United States, No. 7:06-cv-00336-JLK (W.D. Va.

June 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -