Barnett v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Barnett v. United States

206 F. App'x 314

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2006·No. No. 06-7130·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Barnett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) in relation to the court’s denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnett v. United States, No. 7:06-cv-00336-JLK (W.D.Va. June 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Barnett appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) in relation to the court’s denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Barnett v. United States, No. 7:06-cv-00336-JLK (W.D.Va. June 12, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Barnett v. United States, 206 F. App'x 314 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

206 F. App'x 314 (Barnett v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related