Barnett v. State

1930 OK CR 353, 290 P. 1111, 48 Okla. Crim. 229, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 99

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barnett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Okla. Crim. 153 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 16, 1930·No. No. A-7477.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor, and her punishment fixed at a fine of f500 and confinement in the county jail for a period of six months.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 24th day of July, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights. The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 24th day of July, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error and no appearance made for oral argument.

Upon a careful examination of the record, we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights. The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Barnett v. State, 1930 OK CR 353, 290 P. 1111, 48 Okla. Crim. 229, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 99 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 353 (Barnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.