Barnett v. State

1930 OK CR 351, 290 P. 1110, 48 Okla. Crim. 230, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barnett v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 41 Okla. Crim. 153
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 16, 1930·No. No. A-7364.·Published

Opinion

EDWARDS, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Garfield county on a charge of having the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor and was sentenced to pay a fine of $500 and to confinement in the county jail for a term of six months.

The state has filed a motion to dismiss, from which it appears that the defendant, after conviction, was at large upon a supersedeas bond; that she has left the state of Oklahoma, is a fugitive, and her whereabouts are unknown.

It is settled by many decisions of this court that where a defendant has been convicted and perfects an appeal to this court, this court will not consider his appeal unless he is where he can be made to respond to any judgment or order which may be rendered in the case. Where a defendant becomes a fugitive from justice pending the determination of his appeal, this court upon proper motion will dismiss the same.

The case is dismissed.

DAVENPORT and CHAPPELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnett v. State, 1930 OK CR 351, 290 P. 1110, 48 Okla. Crim. 230, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 98 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

1930 OK CR 351 (Barnett v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.