Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp.
168 A. 296, 114 N.J. Eq. 44, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1351
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 N.J. Eq. 43 →
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N. J. Eq. 1.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Trenohaed, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — Rone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp., 168 A. 296, 114 N.J. Eq. 44, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 1351 (N.J. 1933).
168 A. 296 (Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.