Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp.
168 A. 296, 114 N.J. Eq. 43
Opinion
The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes, and reported in 112 N. J. Eq. 1.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Van Bus-kirk, Kays, Hetfteld, Dear, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp., 168 A. 296, 114 N.J. Eq. 43 (N.J. 1933).
168 A. 296 (Barnett v. Schickerling Products Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Petchensky
183 A. 472 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)