Barnett v. Johnson
This text of 36 F. App'x 628 (Barnett v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth Barnett, an Oregon prisoner, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, challenging his thirty-year sentence imposed as a result of his guilty plea conviction for three counts of first-degree rape of a minor. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo the denial of a § 2254 petition, Dows v. Wood, 211 F.3d 480, 484 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
The district court granted Barnett a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) may be applied retroactively in a collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.1 This [629]*629issue is now foreclosed by our recent decision in Rees v. Hill, 286 F.3d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir.2002) (denying petitioner’s request to file a successive § 2254 petition because Apprendi does not apply retroactively on collateral review).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 F. App'x 628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnett-v-johnson-ca9-2002.