Barnett v. Johnson
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kenneth Barnett, an Oregon prisoner, appeals the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition, challenging his thirty-year sentence imposed as a result of his guilty plea conviction for three counts of first-degree rape of a minor. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253. We review de novo the denial of a § 2254 petition, Dows v. Wood, 211 F.3d 480, 484 (9th Cir.2000), and we affirm.
The district court granted Barnett a certificate of appealability on the issue of whether Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000) may be applied retroactively in a collateral proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2254.1 This [629] issue is now foreclosed by our recent decision in Rees v. Hill, 286 F.3d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir.2002) (denying petitioner’s request to file a successive § 2254 petition because Apprendi does not apply retroactively on collateral review).
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
36 F. App'x 628 (Barnett v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.