Barnes v. State
This text of 658 So. 2d 538 (Barnes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Bruce BARNES, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Stephen M. Martin, Lakeland, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ron Napolitano, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment and sentences in all respects, but strike the imposition of the "cost/fine" in the amount of $33 because it was not announced at sentencing and there is no statutory authority given for the assessment of such a cost. Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994). On remand, the state may seek to reimpose these costs consistent with the law expressed in Sutton.
Affirmed as modified and remanded with directions.
RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and QUINCE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
658 So. 2d 538, 1995 WL 10442, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnes-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.