Barnes v. State

563 So. 2d 114, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3367, 1990 WL 62890
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Barnes v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 576 So. 2d 758
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 15, 1990·No. No. 88-1501·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Freddie Barnes pled no contest to a charge of possession of cocaine, expressly reserving the right to appeal the order denying his motion to suppress. We conclude that the scope of the search warrant and the search pursuant thereto were both within the scope permitted by Samuel v. State, 222 So.2d 3 (Fla.1969), and were consistent with the fourth amendment analysis set forth in State v. De Simone, 60 N.J. 319, 288 A.2d 849, 850 (1972). See also 2 W. LaFave, Search & Seizure §§ 4.5(e), 4.9(c) (1987). The circumstances involved in the present case were significantly different from those presented in Ybarra v. Illinois, a case involving a search within a public bar. 444 U.S. 85, 88-92 & n. 4, 100 S.Ct. 338, 340-343 & n. 4, 62 L.Ed.2d 238, 243-46 & n. 4 (1979).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes v. State, 563 So. 2d 114, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3367, 1990 WL 62890 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 114 (Barnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ybarra v. Illinois
444 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 1980)
Samuel v. State
222 So. 2d 3 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)
State v. De Simone
288 A.2d 849 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972)