Barnes v. State
553 So. 2d 778, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7190, 1989 WL 153669
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 20, 1989·No. No. 88-2895·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction but reverse the sentencing order and remand for a new sentencing proceeding. The state has conceded that the trial court must impose sentence in accord with the plea agreement or permit appellant an opportunity to withdraw his plea. See Reaves v. State, 417 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). The issues as to the absence of a guidelines scoresheet and the taxation of costs without notice are mooted by our reversal of the sentence, although the state has conceded error on these issues too.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Barnes v. State, 553 So. 2d 778, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 7190, 1989 WL 153669 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
553 So. 2d 778 (Barnes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mullin v. State
571 So. 2d 1382 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
State v. Lacey
553 So. 2d 778 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)