Barnard v. Hoyt

Illinois Supreme Court

Barnard v. Hoyt

63 Ill. 341

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 15, 1872

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 Ill. 341 (Barnard v. Hoyt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barnard v. Hoyt, 63 Ill. 341 (Ill. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Cueiam :

This case does not differ in principle from Gage v. Rohrbach, 56 Ill. 262, Same v. Billings, ibid. 268, and Reed v. Tyler, ibid. 288. It was there held that a court of chancery might interfere in behalf of a party in possession, to remove the cloud occasioned by an invalid tax sale under which title was claimed. In this case notice of the sale was not given in the manner required by the constitution and by the statute.

The decree is affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Cueiam :

This case does not differ in principle from Gage v. Rohrbach, 56 Ill. 262, Same v. Billings, ibid. 268, and Reed v. Tyler, ibid. 288. It was there held that a court of chancery might interfere in behalf of a party in possession, to remove the cloud occasioned by an invalid tax sale under which title was claimed. In this case notice of the sale was not given in the manner required by the constitution and by the statute.

The decree is affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

63 Ill. 341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barnard-v-hoyt-ill-1872.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack