Barkett v. State
This text of 728 So. 2d 792 (Barkett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
James M. BARKETT, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Appellant, pro se.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
James M. Barkett was convicted of premeditated first degree murder. He appealed and this court affirmed the conviction and sentence in Barkett v. State, 666 So.2d 902 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996). The mandate issued January 23, 1996. Barkett filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, which denied the petition on June 3, 1996. See Barkett v. State, 517 U.S. 1237, 116 S.Ct. 1884, 135 L.Ed.2d 179 (1996). Barkett then filed this rule 3.850 motion, on May 26, 1998. See Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992). The trial court denied the motion as untimely.
Barkett's rule 3.850 motion is timely. See Beaty v. State, 701 So.2d 856 (Fla.1997); Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1990). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order denying Barkett's rule 3.850 motion as untimely and remand for consideration of the motion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
BARFIELD, C.J., LAWRENCE and BROWNING, JJ. CONCUR.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
728 So. 2d 792, 1999 WL 89888, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barkett-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.